|HOME BUSINESS STEP-BY-STEP GUIDES || WORK AT HOME IDEAS || BIZ OPPS || ARTICLES || CLASSIFIEDS || MESSAGE BOARDS|
|WAHM Directory || Promote Your Business || Links || Freebies || Kid Stuff || Recipes || Work at Home Blog || Contact || Advertise|
|TOP 20 WORK AT HOME JOBS IN YOUR CITY || WORK AT HOME JOB SEARCH || OUR SITES || PRINTABLES || BIZ TOOLS || ABOUT|
LOS ANGELES (December 15, 2010) – In a new report, the Parents Television CouncilTM details the nature and extent of Hollywood’s obsession with sexualizing teen girls. PTC’s report, Tinseltown’s New Target: A study of Teen Female Sexualization on Primetime TV, is based on a content analysis of the most popular primetime broadcast shows among 12 to 17-year-olds during the 2009-2010 TV season. To view PTC’s full report, visit: www.parentstv.org/sexualization.
PTC found that when underage female characters appear on screen: more sexual content is depicted; the teen girls show next to no negative response to being sexualized; more sexual incidents occur outside of any form of a committed relationship; and there is less accuracy in the TV content rating.
“The results from this report show Tinseltown’s eagerness to not only objectify and fetishize young girls, but to sexualize them in such a way that real teens are led to believe their sole value comes from their sexuality. This report is less about the shocking numbers that detail the sickness of early sexualization in our entertainment culture and more about the generation of young girls who are being told how society expects them to behave,” said PTC President Tim Winter.
“Storylines on the most popular shows among teens are sending the message to our daughters that being sexualized isn’t just acceptable, it should be sought after. It is outrageous that TV executives have made it their business to profit off of programs that depict teen girls blissfully being sexualized by casual partners and only showing disapproval for being sexualized five percent of the time.
“The TV networks really stick it to families by leaving off the â€˜S’ descriptor to warn them about this type of sexual content a shocking 75 percent of the time. But parents and the PTC aren’t just asking for more warning, we are asking the entertainment industry to take immediate steps to reverse this trend.
“It will take action from parents, actors themselves, and advertisers who pay for TV content – not to mention awareness on the part of the public and our elected representatives – to instigate change. Combining the pervasiveness of teen sexualization with the well-documented research on the consequences – everything from body dissatisfaction to depression – should be more than enough.
“To any parent of a pre-teen or teenage girl, the harm of sexualized imagery is readily apparent. We cannot allow our daughters, not to mention boys and adult men, to accept the message that women should be valued only for their sex appeal – even if it seems every magazine cover, billboard, movie, and television program convey that message,” Winter concluded.
Nielsen data was used to identify the top 25 shows for ages 12 to 17. Analysts focused on scripted, primetime broadcast programming on the top 25 list which aired during the first two weeks of the November 2009 sweeps period (October 29, 2009 – November 11, 2009) and the May 2010 sweeps period (April 29, 2010 – May 12, 2010). The data was reviewed based on numerous different factors ranging from the genre of the program to the gender of the initiator and the participant’s attitude toward the sexualizing incident.
–Underage female characters are shown participating in a higher percentage of sexual depictions compared to adults (47% and 29% respectively).
–Only 5% of the underage female characters communicated any form of dislike for being sexualized (excluding scenes depicting healthy sexuality).
–Out of all the sexualized female characters depicted in the underage and young adult category for the entire database, 86% were presented as only being of high school age.
–Seventy-five percent of shows that included sexualized underage female characters were shows that did not have an “S” descriptor to warn parents about the sexual content.
–Based upon a definition established by the American Psychological Association of “healthy” vs. “unhealthy” sexuality, the study findings show that 93% of the sexual incidents involving underage female characters occurred within a context that qualified as “unhealthy.”
–The data revealed that 98% of the sexual incidents involving underage female characters occurred outside of any form of a committed relationship.
–The data show that 73% of the underage sexualized incidents were presented in a humorous manner or as a punch line to a joke.
To view additional web content including images, video examples and the full study, visit PTC’s female sexualization website at www.parentstv.org/sexualization.
The Parents Television CouncilÂ® (www.parentstv.orgÂ®) is a non-partisan education organization advocating responsible entertainment. It was founded in 1995 to ensure that children are not constantly assaulted by sex, violence and profanity on television and in other media. This national grassroots organization has more than 1.3 million members and 56 chapters across the United States, and works with television producers, broadcasters, networks and sponsors in an effort to stem the flow of harmful and negative messages targeted to children. The PTCTM also works with elected and appointed government officials to enforce broadcast decency standards. Most importantly, the PTC produces critical research and publications documenting the dramatic increase in sex, violence and profanity in entertainment. This information is provided free of charge so parents can make informed viewing choices for their own families.
This is the news of the day floating around on business and social media blogs.Â Needless to say – it is very scary.Â Â Soak it all in folks:
You used to be able to close your account with Facebook and that meant that your content was not theirs to use anymore, their license to use it ended.Â No longer the case – they own the rights to everything now – whether you close your account or not.
Here is the old TOS:
“You hereby grant Facebook an irrevocable, perpetual, non-exclusive, transferable, fully paid, worldwide license (with the right to sublicense) to (a) use, copy, publish, stream, store, retain, publicly perform or display, transmit, scan, reformat, modify, edit, frame, translate, excerpt, adapt, create derivative works and distribute (through multiple tiers), any User Content you (i) Post on or in connection with the Facebook Service or the promotion thereof subject only to your privacy settings or (ii) enable a user to Post, including by offering a Share Link on your website and (b) to use your name, likeness and image for any purpose, including commercial or advertising, each of (a) and (b) on or in connection with the Facebook Service or the promotion thereof.”
The above stays in tact BUT they have removed these two lines from their TOS:
“You may remove your User Content from the Site at any time. If you choose to remove your User Content, the license granted above will automatically expire, however you acknowledge that the Company may retain archived copies of your User Content.”
And Facebook has added the following to the Termination part near the end of the TOS:
“The following sections will survive any termination of your use of the Facebook Service: Prohibited Conduct, User Content, Your Privacy Practices, Gift Credits, Ownership; Proprietary Rights, Licenses, Submissions, User Disputes; Complaints, Indemnity, General Disclaimers, Limitation on Liability, Termination and Changes to the Facebook Service, Arbitration, Governing Law; Venue and Jurisdiction and Other.”
(TOS via Consumerist)
So – it boils down to Facebook users beware and be cautious of what you do out there in Facebook land.Â Don’t write anything that you want to retain the rights to.Â Don’t upload pictures that you want to retain legal rights to.Â Â
Always good to take the time to read the Terms of Service for any website or program you sign up for.
UPDATE: The founder of Facebook – Mark Zuckerberg – has posted a response and clarification on the change in TOSÂ (I’m guessing they were inundated with complaints and emails today) on the official Facebook Blog
Digging around even further – this was posted this afternoon at The Industry Standard. A Facebook representative emaile them the following response and clarifiction:
“We are not claiming and have never claimed ownership of material that users upload. The new Terms were clarified to be more consistent with the behavior of the site. That is, if you send a message to another user (or post to their wall, etc…), that content might not be removed by Facebook if you delete your account (but can be deleted by your friend). Furthermore, it is important to note that this license is made subject to the user’s privacy settings. So any limitations that a user puts on display of the relevant content (e.g. To specific friends) are respected by Facebook. Also, the license only allows us to use the info “in connection with the Facebook Service or the promotion thereof.” Users generally expect and understand this behavior as it has been a common practice for web services since the advent of webmail. For example, if you send a message to a friend on a webmail service, that service will not delete that message from your friend’s inbox if you delete your account.”
So – sounds like the main issue/solution is privacy settings that everyone needs to pay attention to.